Confirm.Works 100% for update without any mistake and no failed.Nice posting.

Trust me...it's not cracked. They just threw in a current working key and called it good. CU even acknowledges the mislabeling on their site. It'll expire pretty quick.

The download link doesn't work ...

It's ????!

It's havn't any crack!!

Is this x32 or x64?

need user and password for update
where is it?

Best of software

for all kaspersky fan..you can make your own kaspersky..

the ingredients:
1.shit
2.your mother ass
3.you father ass
4.two tea spoon ***

thats all..and blend it..wow you make your own kaspershit..

and you know what uagadugu..
you dont have to care about what AV im used..get the hell out of here ass..

The download link doesn't work ...

..)) kasper//\\rullezz

In my case, the first link work.

just add http://www.nod32.com/nod_eval/ to the update servers. it works for me, for now :)

i need NOD32.LIC to enable Mirror Update Server. Does anyone have a link to download a non-expire license file? thanks

VORKING GOD BUT KANT DELIT TROJAN VIRUS

kaspersky uses the word 'BETA' with its releases which r not final....but NOD32 doesnt use it and keeps churning out releases every now and then....nod32 is plagued with bugs n crap n they r not willing to accept that by using the word "BETA". And all those mother fu.ckers who use NODshit complain abt kaspersky...at least they say its not the final unlike the NOD ***es!!

"cracked" ver? wtf?? its just a lame ass serial which will get black list in the speed of light...whos thoos lame grous eho release such crap? hehe

sangdj you ar right..best crack i know until now..include very fast link..f u c k U sangdj..you better get the hell out of here..better get the hell of from this forum.

The 2 best AV are nod32 and spydoctor 5.5

this version Cracked is 32 or 64

lo axman i thing i gona usr your link for free 90 days using nod32 till they find 100% crack for this nod32 ver 3 :)

jups, I did it last year as nod HK have given 3 months licenses. After this time a newer version will be already out and 3.0.566 will be history. Between the 90days license you have high priority update server not the low priority trial update server.

This don't have any crack? Why the subject is: "ESET NOD32 Antivirus Business Edition v3.0.566 Cracked"

The latest AV-Comparatives prove NOD32 supirior once again to kaspershit. clkgtr and uagadugu will rant and rave, but the facts remain.

NOD32 Is and always will be the best.

I have it installed,(Nod32 AV Business Edition 32bits) just hope it lasts till the day Nsane will present us the new Fix,he is working on.Then all problems will be gone.
First update worked. Let`s see tomorrow...

cheers
jofre

Test history

 

December 2007 - Kaspersky Anti-Virus

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: Kaspersky Anti-Virus
More: December 2007 in full
Review: Kaspersky Anti-Virus on Windows 2000

 

June 2007 - Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.2.621

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.2.621
More: June 2007 in full
Review: Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.2.621 on Windows XP

 

NOD32:

KING!

New Fix for ESET (Tested on 07/12/07):

ESET NOD32 AntiVirus 3.0.566.0 Retail 32bit
http://Nod30566-x86.no tlong.com

ESET Smart Security 3.0.566.0 Retail 32bit
http://ESS-x86.no tlong.com

*Without spaces

-----
wtf 9down y do u keep deleting this pach is working so y delete it??

nodlogin 8.0a update to nodlogin 8.0b not working
HELP

Check my post above u

I posted the working Nodlogin8b fix.
Still working 8/12/07

Enjoy. Hope this will help u all.

HOPELESS RETARDS!!

dont trust nod login your anti viruse wont work like it should nod login =your info being used on the net thanks suckers lol
y cant some one figer out a way to make 30 day trails keys using a key gen of sorts ??????
no patches = no protection = your bank account info being stolen = a lot of patches are for tards

UserName: EAV-01089799
PassWord: xfj8rvmw3s

UserName: EAV-00319935
PassWord: 6ft67npbcn

UserName: EAV-00319234
PassWord: perbm5aebd

UserName: EAV-00316727
PassWord: nkwtmvh6xw

UserName: EAV-00319925
PassWord: 5rwts2sdce

UserName: EAV-00315176
PassWord: xe4adsmx4f

UserName: EAV-00315168
PassWord: n3nawppfj4

UserName: AV-7087321
PassWord: h528kodyt0

UserName: AV-7009043
PassWord: vu34kgnc4a

New NOD32 Upgrade Server From NOD321.com

http://up1.nod123.cn

any user and password ????????

Hack begin

1. download original retail version
2. one get valid key
3. download from server the xml scheme file.
4. host the xml file include the daily update files (works like mirror update server, without need login)
5. users change the update server to a private one.

Hack finish

forgot:
to stay up to date automatically:
Add in cpanel a cron job to automatizing download upload to your server the hourly updates etc...

BAD NODLOGIN.EXE Trojan.DoS.Win32.Opdos
DEFINITION OF: NODLOGIN.EXE

* Safety Rating: Known Malware, do not run
* Malware Family: Part of Malware group - Trojan DoS Win32 Opdos
* Malware Form: TROJAN
First seen: Nov 22 2007 (GMT)
Last seen: Nov 22 2007 (GMT)
File Size: 260,014 bytes
File Names Used: 6
Paths Used: 17
Common File Name: NODLOGIN.EXE
Malware Group Propagation Rate: Moderate (spreading)
Malware Group: Trojan DoS Win32 Opdo

lo axman... idont have a clude what are u talking about
"1. download original retail version
2. one get valid key
3. download from server the xml scheme file.
4. host the xml file include the daily update files (works like mirror update server, without need login)
5. users change the update server to a private one"

can u explain it more widely? 10x mate ;)

You need the retail version
any valid key or one get a license for long time.
by updating nod, watch in connection monitor or in the process the url from a nod update server it request a xml file (its the update scheme)
inside is the list of files how you extract them, place them and download them, file by file and put on a webserver include the xml file.
whatever.yourdomain.tld
done, so you have a update server hosted.
automatizes with your control panel by hosting crone job or otherwise that it download and upload (transfer) all upcomming updates to your server.
All clients change the update server url in eset to that (mirrored updates) domain. No expire anymore if one have a license and host regular updated 1:1 the updated files.

this methos good as far as the key is vaild ...if it expired like most of them shortly?

I will take one of the free 3 Months keys given by some authorizated distributors online every year before Xmas (Google 90 days....)

Hint by bitdefender
disable system service LIVESRV
(BitDefender Desktop Update Service)
disable online updates in the program
Download weekly.exe update file
By installing disable online connection / go offline.
Re-enable temporary service LIVESRV that the update file can finished. Disable it after.
In the moment when u or the program request online updates it send before the serial to them server and its blocked if don't block automatic updates by bitdefender > see workstation w/o internet direct access manual update process.

what are the difference between nod32 and nod32 Business Edition ?? eset didnt point it clearly

Im not sure maybe the licensing only. Didnt found any differences. The update instructions are the same as LAN server = Webserver by them website pdf to download.
After all eset.logon mailware and co infection. I realize that autorun virus as i reboot was there but most AV cant detect all kinds of malware such as in Nod.login or alias eset.login.
Finaly I found solution here to clean the PC from this malware patches and the results of these.
How to get ripped from this malware if you have executed any of these infected patches:
Try this:
get the free Version from Prevx CSI Free Malware Scanner v1.2.101.108 and delete the founded files by self
or sign up for a business license 1 year free updates by prevx.com/registration.asp?
Prevx CSI v1.2.101.108 Mailware detection and Cleanup License free after sign up comes the download link.

this will enable clean up and many more. Seems to be one of the best malware scanner and remover.

does anyone have new crack for eset security x64
like nodlogin 8.0a-b but works

ESET smart security clip in czech lang
w w w. zshare. net/video/5466829059b5e5/

Username:EAV-00315163
Password:whebb83usx

Username:EAV-00315165
Password:57e754cjst

Username:EAV-00878179
Password:h2c8f68vd2

Username:EAV-00317646
Password:fdpr4jrrp3

Username:EAV-00453436
Password:6eavahj7vu

I'M REALLY GLAD TO GIVE YA ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE -KINDLY DEDICATED TO THE PAIR OF DUMBASSES CLOWNS: PERFECTDUMB & nodCRAPGAY:

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE FOR YOU POOR NAIVE nodCRAP USERS:

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

I think that it's time to permanently ban this clown off this site (uagadugu). The nonsense is getting on everybody's nerves. Unless he's getting paid for spreading Kaspersky "propaganda" this person's a true imbecile.

Dont worry. The mods will delete all this crap by morning.

Even they know that kaspershit has "never" passed any comparatives in its miserable exsistence.

NOD32..it never fails.

People who program Viruses I think them first priority is to bypass the most common used AV protection software programs otherwise them viruses will be founded quick by protected systems. The second way is spreed some kind of patches for cracking an antivirus program by injecting itself a virus or make a backdoor open so that the av will not more protect fully. Scan all Patches first with any online multi scanner before apply any of these cracks. Once a AV is injected with a Virus you will never found it out.

look there clean nod server update downloader / uploader and update server folder view tool include save updates to local folder. Run updates as LAN update: leechermods.dl.am
Works with all eset products and some more.

Yo uagadipshit...

Whats it like to lie when everyone knows your a liar?

Whats it like to be ex-con?

Were you raped alot in prison?

Why are yo finding it so hard to reabilitate?

Why lie?

We all know it was kaspershit that failed every test in the book. Anyone can just go to the av comparatives site or the VB100 site and see you a scumbag liar.

Try to reintergrate back into society as a productive citisen instead of a peice of shit as you usually are.

I bet even you probation officer will not use kaspershit. He's smarter then your average uagaqdugu.

NOD32 "proven" the best time after time.

POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB -PASTE IT TO UR RETARDED BRAIN-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

ur nodCRAP TRASHED!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kaspersky is like having a thousand virus kicking Ninjas inside your pc - you don't know they're there, but they are !!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

I told ya BitDefender isn't bad!!!
And speaka my Language coz it's downloadable in up to all Languages.

Once again NOD32 has been proven better than Kaspersky.
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2007_11.php


Wheres your god now uagadugu?

Above link from wilders security forum ;)

KASPERSKY IS KING

nodCRAP TRASHED!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kaspersky is like having a thousand virus kicking Ninjas inside your pc - you don't know they're there, but they are !!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

The daily betas combined with the monthly test failures of Kaspersky have caused uagadugu to lose his mind.

Now he is just making stuff up, like a broken computer.

Error! Error!
Cannot compute!
Error!

At least Anti-Smart was "smart" enough to go into the Witness Protection Program; he is MIA.

VB100 results summary for december 2007 :
December 2007 - Kaspersky Anti-Virus

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: Kaspersky Anti-Virus
More: December 2007 in full
Review: Kaspersky Anti-Virus on Windows 2000
Details: Only available to subscribers.





June 2007 - Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.2.621

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.2.621
More: June 2007 in full
Review: Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.2.621 on Windows XP
Details: Only available to subscribers.



2 fails per 7 months.... :/ enough, and thousands of betas per week :D:D:D they are just kidding

kamatoz: Glad to see someone else knows the "real" results of the VB100.

uagadipshit should be use to kaspershits failures by now. They are a regualar occurance.

To th mods.

uagadugu has just been released from prison.

He has an attitude.

He is a liar. And a trouble maker in general.

The fact that his computer still functions after being in prison for as long as he was is nothing short of proof of a deal with the devil.

However he also exihibits behavior that is unexceptable.

It time to pull his plug and ban him.

POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB -PASTE IT TO UR RETARDED BRAIN-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Only crazy peoples with brain shit get this software with crack inside.

uagadugu is LAMABOT!!!! :D he only posting some crazy shit results of his own, cause all his posts are just remakes of real results, he is making copy paste everywhere of Kaspersky, let this kid play maybe someday he will understand where to find real results or test...:D:D:D:D LAMA

uagadugu is kaspersky fa(g)n :-)

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE FOR YOU POOR NAIVE nodCRAP USERS:

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

wahahahaha :D:D:D:D i think uagadugu is an answering machine :D:D:D "copy paste, copy paste" the same shit created by himself, aaaa :D:D:D:D:D:D:D LAMABOT!!!!!!!

kaspershit is truly TRASH fail twice in this year.

uagadugu, U LIAR!!! IS ALL OVER THE WEB NOW. JUST DO ME A FAVOR, FIND A 100 FLOOR AND JUMP DOWN FROM THERE. U SON OF THE B*TCH

http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/results.xml?display=summary

http://www.nod321.com/ daily updates of passwords for NOD32

Yaknow...I can just picture little uagadipshit, sitting in that dard bacement. Cardboard spaceship cast onto the corner.

Sobbing as he franticly paste and re-paste the same thing over and over again.

You made it all up yourseld dumbass.

We know that.

Now nobody will ever belive anything you have to say because we all know your a liar.

NOD2 won.

Read the real results.

TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

uagadugu, NOD32 also achieved the highest certification in the latest av-comparatives, but NOD32 was able to do something that Kaspershit couldn't:

Pass the December 2007 VB100!

HAWHAWHAW!!


NOD32 IS THE ONLY KING

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

"...
http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587..." :D:D:D:D:D hahaha Kaspersky about himself?!?!?! veeery nice :D

username and password please.

doesnt work with Win2k3 Server R2 Sp2

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

WHEN TRUTH REALLY HURTS...

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSHIT TOTAL "TRASH"

FAIL TO PROTECT PC

http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/results.xml?display=summary

SUCKS IN Retrospective / ProActive

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2007_11.php

JUST ONE WORD "FAILURE"

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

http://www.nod321.com/ daily updates of passwords for NOD32

That's Right

If You Using Kaspersky or another AV

NEVER Complaining ABOUT NOD32

Stop Spamming
uagaSSHOLE

You Lost, Dead

Posting AV-TEST.ORG test at 23.11.07

its expired ya' know

You LOST

Kaspersky LOST

NOD32 Wins

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

uaga?

Are you...talking...to yourself??

Enough cheating each other!! i decided to make one super anti-virus program:
NOD32 + Kaspersky = KasperNODsky32
i think it will be the leader program :)))))))))))

Ok!

I went to the AV-Test.org website.

I clicked every link they got.

Cont find any list the remotely resembles uagadugus.

Conclusion.

Total lie...again.

Dont take my word for it. You already know you cant believe a thing that uaga says. Hes been lying since day one and has been busted so many times at it I'm surprised hes not back in prison for it.

Now everyone here knows.

uagadugu is a scumbag lier.

NOD32 is the proven best.

Period.

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

WOW TRUTH REALLY HURTS!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Your License will run out shortly.
Here is the screen shot.
This buniness edition will expire on 27th December, 2007

[IMG]http://i18.tinypic.com/6jb82v5.jpg[/IMG]

verry good, thank you

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE FOR YOU POOR NAIVE nodCRAP USERS:

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

WHEN THE TRUTH REALLY HURTS...

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

ARGHHHH

THIS UAGADUGU has make me ANGRY

F*** OFF

OUT FROM THIS BOARD

GO TO YOUR KASPERSKY BOARD

BYE2 UAGADUGU

I DONT THINK KASPERSKY CAN HANDLE THIS VIRUS

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

WOW TRUTH REALLY HURTS!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

Thanks To all the comments here, i really don't like how iagadugu act about nod, Nod is not really that bad as u think and more than that It has handled alot of Unbearable Viruses which corrupt files extension, but in the mean time I agree that Nod is going bad about the detection of files, I'm one of Nod fans for 1 year if not more, But yesterday I had my USB stick memory I was visiting my friend and wanted to show him some programs on it, He hooked up the USB stick and wanted to scan it with his Mcafee antivirus and It found a trojan, i couldnt remember the name but nod 3.0.563 nor 2.7.39 which i'm using were able to detect it. But uagadugus please don't act like a total retard if nod has failed you once. Kasper is worse and I tried this, btw once you have an infected computer with a virus not any kind only some specific dangerous viruses you might not be able to install kasper as u will have alot of error messages during the setup, while with nod it will be so easy to install it without any problems and after updating the signature database most of these dangerous malware are removed on the first scan.

the key is not working any one suggust new one,
waiting thanks

ESET NOD32 IS KING

NOD32 latest escalation ID: http://www.nod123.cn/

upgrading servers: http://up1.nod123.cn

EVERYONE HAS "HIS/HER" RIGHT TO CHOOSE. ONE CANNOT FORCE OTHER TO CHOOSE WHAT IS GOOD. EVERYONE HAS LIKING FOR A PARTICULAR SET OF FEATURES/BRAND/COMPANY WHICH OTHERS MAY NOT LIKE.

FIGHTING FOR BOTH (KASPERSKY/NOD32) WILL NOT GIVE ANYTHING TO ANYONE. NEITHER THE COMPANIES WILL PROMOTE YOU AS "BRAND AMBASSADORS" FOR THE PRODUCTS...

REMEMBER, FORUMS ARE MADE FOR SENSIBLE AND TOPIC RELATED DISCUSSIONS, AND NOT FOR ARGUMENT AND ABUSIVE LANGUAGE...

WE ALL ARE "CIVILISED AND INTELLIGENT PEOPLE", THAT IS WHY WE HAVE GOOD KNOWLEDGE TO SHARE. USE YOUR KNOWLEDGE IN A POSITIVE WAY, DON'T FORCE ANYONE AS EACH FORCE FACES EQUAL AND OPPOSITE FORCE...

I KNOW EVERYONE IS POSSESSIVE ABOUT THEIR BRANDS, BUT HAVE SOME COMMON SENSE....

YEAH YOU'RE CORRECT:

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

TRY THIS,WORKING 100%:

1. Open ESET Smart Security or ESET NOD32 Antivirus 3.0 and hit F5.
A new window will open.



2. Select "Update" and then click on "Edit..."



3. On "Update servers:" put http://eset.ihl5.com/ and then click Add . Finally click OK



4. Make sure the server is selected and then press OK . Done! Now you can update withouth any problems and you don't even need a password.

thank you, this really works.

You are looking for common sense,  philomath?

 

How about some common sense from Av-Comparatives:

 

"The overall winner product (best antivirus) of 2007 is NOD32"  -  AV-Comparatives

 

 

 

From the Weblog of AV-Comparatives

 

December 17th, 2007

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

WOW TRUTH REALLY HURTS!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

YEAH YOU'RE CORRECT:

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Product of the Year, idiot; Product of the YEAR!!

WHATCHA SAID BRAINLESS FAGGOT?

WOW TRUTH REALLY HURTS!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

HEY UAGADIPSHITTTTT!!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Kaspershit made such a suckass showing in the comparatives I figured your mommy had already found you hanging in the closet.

What did the rope break? Or you just to stupid to even pull that off?

Just keep posting your edited bullshit. Even anti smart isn't stupid enough to back you up anymore. And boyfreind is to busy trying to figure out his own sexual orientation to keep supporting this dead cow.

Post louder asshole so everyone can see how much of a scumbag lying peice of shit you really are.

And remember...

NOD32 "IS THE BEST OF THE BEST AGAIN"!!!

HAHAHAHA.

Kaspershit just got flushed.

JUST TO CLARIFY THINGS:

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

NOD is crap

Kaspersky is KING

NOD is crap

Kaspersky is KING

Proven thing:
NOD is crap

Kaspersky is KING

Just check and verify urself.

JUST TO CLARIFY THINGS:

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

So i see, you all know how to copy and paste.

sad kids....

thank net2net

For your eset smart security or nod32 antivirus used this link ,this patch working 100%!

Need good user name and pass for NOD32

UserName: EAV-00960850
PassWord: xf3bw7wcdm

UserName: EAV-00593280
PassWord: u3j7kfpu66

UserName: EAV-00591437
PassWord: wtw8ftu5cb

UserName: EAV-00591447
PassWord: euc5sr5bwj

UserName: EAV-00594380
PassWord: eejjbh8jsu

UserName: EAV-00781406
PassWord: n8vjrr2w7n

UserName: EAV-00459381
PassWord: tpahmdm52m

UserName: EAV-00459382
PassWord: m638fewmb2

UserName: EAV-00459308
PassWord: p65aes8fdr

UserName: AV-5940531
PassWord: n9dkvon34f

UserName: EAV-00781406
PassWord: n8vjrr2w7n

Username:EAV-00593280
Password:u3j7kfpu66

Username:EAV-01156987
Password:st8nf3mtbh

Username:EAV-00459382
Password:m638fewmb2

Username:EAV-00459381
Password:tpahmdm52m

Username:EAV-01383470
Password:2s4fhma8t8

Username:AV-7095944
Password:4os6f85dpc

Username:EAV-00164093
Password:cenu3vs5s4

Thank you so much Husam212

JUST TO CLARIFY THINGS:

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

The download link doesn't work ... Oh On

Well, I test the Kaspersky with my own computer.

It crashed after I installed it and run it for the first time. I think it's because my lack of RAM. they ate more than 512mb of ram in my PC.

and when I played my normal PC games that works fine with NOD32, Kaspersky said it's a friggin virus.

Hey, it's licensed game developed by a big company with more than million budget !! Should I believe it's virus like Kaspersky said and sue the game company for planting me virus? HELL NO !!


Disregards any test results or any comments. I test it myself, and found out that Nod32 is better than Kaspersky. period.


I can't believe anyone more than myself this time.

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KasPerSky = Russian
NOD = ??? NOrth DEvence????

Stupid thrylos7 spammer we know all we must replace - with stars or was it points between???
....r.a.p.i.p.s.h.a.r.e...
so many points for you ...n...e...e...d...e...d
Take it as a joke, poorly guy , PEACE :)

rubbishare.com
rubbish-are.com/files/00721008801/inject.eset2beinfected.rar

remove the -

uagadugu..i have suggestion for you. try to find some good strong white rope..check if it can endure a big peace of beef hanged, and then ask your mother or father or anyone who can life garbage to actually grab you and tire you by your feet and then hang you somewhere..and then let them give you one more rusty knife ..and then while you hanging upside down..try to pick your eyes out, than cut your head and kill yourself...

and suggestion for the admins..please ban this pork outta here.he didn't do anything usefull for comunity unless spiting on ppl and sh1ting on wrong topics.

my friend was right..pointless to explain something to the idiot! they just don't get it!!!!